If I may be permitted to quote myself in print, on the subject of how the United Kingdom might meet her historic responsibilities under the Balfour Declaration:
Interference? Our Secretary of State for Defence, Liam Fox, has recently resigned because his office had been found to be the centre of a parallel British foreign policy conducted by, on behalf of, and at the expense of the Israeli Far Right and its American neoconservative bag-carriers. Do not tell us about interference. And note that Fox has not been suspended from the House of Commons, as George Galloway was because of questions relating to his charity. Fox’s ties to the genocidal regime in Sri Lanka also go unpunished.
Back in the days when New Labour was led by Tony Blair and the Conservative Party by Michael Howard, deeply disillusioned former Cabinet Ministers from both sides implored me not to write, even in jest, that our most unaccomplished 16-year-olds should be conscripted directly into the Israeli Defence Force, on the grounds that “if the wrong person reads that, then it will happen”. They were not joking. I was later informed that, entirely independently, something very near to that scheme had been seriously considered within the Blair inner circle. That was how far beyond satire things had moved in the last days of Tony Blair.
In 2009, my Telegraph Blog was cancelled because I pointed out the treasonable relationship between 80 per cent of Conservative MPs, including David Cameron, and the racist Far Right that was and is in government in Israel. My unremarkable observations have been confirmed as fact by the resignation of Liam Fox, and will be so even more if the fiasco surrounding the Raed Salah case leads the urgently needed public inquiry into Israeli and Zionist influence over what is supposed to be Her Majesty’s Government and over the organisation still calling itself the Conservative, sometimes even the Tory, Party. The Editor of Telegraph Blogs, Damian Thompson, publicly branded me insane on this point. For this among other reasons, his position is untenable, and he is a public sinner in the Catholic canonical sense.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Among other reasons, you have got that right. Which will come first, his canonical trial or his treason trial?
ReplyDeleteNothing to do with any of your mates who are still there coveting his job, obviously. They might not wish him dead the way you do, but you cannot deny that they find you a useful ally as kind of outrider or attack dog. His life is already falling apart with the loss of his Catholic Herald spot and the acceleration of his drinking. Which of your motley crew is going to deliver the killer blow?
ReplyDeleteWhat evidence does anyone have to suggest that Damian Thompson isn't loyal to his country or that he drinks at all these days? I'm sure that Damian is a Catholic professional trying to get through life as we all are. I hope one day David that you will be reconciled with Damian.
ReplyDeleteYou do realise he is now in fear for his life? You take great pride in being probably the closest British ally of the Arab Christians. When you write on the Internet that someone like the Phalange should look up his address in Who's Who, go round and sort him out, it has an impact. You intend it to have that impact.
ReplyDeleteI fail to see how the repeated threat to out him carries any more impact, because you have already done it. You have ruined him among traditional Catholics and contributed significantly to the loss of his job at the Herald. But that is not enough for you. You want him killed, and whether that is by an Arab Christian militia or by his own hand does not bother you.
All over an unpaid position in the first place. What the hell would you do to anyone who really crossed you?
All hail the Mossad Martyr of the Daily Telavivagraph!
ReplyDeleteBut is anyone stupid enough to make me the Double Mossad Martyr of the Daily Telavivagraph?
ReplyDeleteAsk Oliver Kamm or Neil Fleming what happens to those who cross David Lindsay. The mere mention of your name must cause them to visibly wince.
ReplyDeleteEvery mention of your previous victories is a nail into their already well-nailed career coffins. You mention it regularly, but why not? The temptation must be almost unbearable.
I know for a fact that one of them displays an encyclopaedic knowledge of this site whenever he tells people not to read it.
ReplyDeleteNeither of them pretends to be anything that he isn't.